PERBANDINGAN TOOLS FORENSIK PADA APLIKASI DOMPET DIGITAL
Abstract
Penggunaan smartphone di Indonesia tidak hanya digunakan sebagai alat untuk komunikasi, akan tetapi dengan hadirnya aplikasi dompet digital maka mulai digunakan pula sebagai alat untuk bertransaksi. Proses forensik pada penelitian ini dilakukan pada empat aplikasi dompet digital yang ada di Indonesia dengan mengikuti metode forensik Digital Forensik Research Workshop (DFRWS) yang memiliki beberapa tahapan yaitu identification, preservation, collection, examination, analysis, dan presentation. Proses forensik dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mencari informasi/dokumen elektronik yang berpotensi menjadi bukti digital yang bisa didapatkan dari aplikasi dompet digital. Tools forensik yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu Autopsy dan Belkasoft Evidence Center. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, tools forensik autopsy mendapatkan hasil lebih baik untuk mendapatkan data aktivitas transaksi yang ada pada aplikasi dompet digital dengan menemukan 8 dari 17 aktivitas transaksi mendapatkan presentase 47.05%, sedangkan tools Belkasoft Evidence Center mendapatkan 7 aktivitas transaksi dengan presentase 41,17%.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Agusta, J. W. N. (2018). Mobile Payments in Indonesia: Race to Big Data Domination. MDI Ventures.
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2020). Laporan Survei Internet APJII 2019 – 2020. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia, 2020, 1–146. Retrieved from https://apjii.or.id/survei
Chanajitt, R., Viriyasitavat, W., & Choo, K. K. R. (2018). Forensic analysis and security assessment of Android m-banking apps. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2016.1182589
Harris, R. (2006). Arriving at an anti-forensics consensus: Examining how to define and control the anti-forensics problem. Digital Investigation, 3(SUPPL.), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2006.06.005
Ipsos. (2020). Indonesia “The Next Cashless Society.”
Konduru, Y., Mishra, N., & Sharma, S. (2018). Acquisition and analysis of forensic data artefacts of some popular apps in android smartphone. Proceedings - IEEE 16th International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, IEEE 16th International Conference on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, IEEE 4th International Conference on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and IEEE 3, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTec.2018.00028
Lwin, H. H., & Aung, W. P. (2020). Forensics Analysis of Mobile Financial Applications Used in Myanmar. Proceedings of the First University Research Conference on Science and Engineering, 1, 19–24.
Osho, O., Mohammed, U. L., Nimzing, N. N., Uduimoh, A. A., & Misra, S. (2019). Forensic Analysis of Mobile Banking Apps. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11623 LNCS, 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24308-1_49
Palmer, G. (2001). A Road Map for Digital Forensic Research. In The Digital Forensic Research Conference. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3950(82)90064-8
Riadi, I., Umar, R., & Firdonsyah, A. (2018). Forensic tools performance analysis on android-based blackberry messenger using NIST measurements. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 8(5), 3991–4003. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v8i5.pp3991-4003
Umar, R., & Sahiruddin. (2019). Metode Nist Untuk Analisis Forensik Bukti Digital Pada Perangkat Android. In Prosiding SENDU_U_2019 (pp. 978–979)
Umar, R., Yudhana, A., & Faiz, M. N. (2018). Experimental analysis of web browser sessions using live forensics method. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 8(5), 2951–2958. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v8i5.pp2951-2958
Yudhana, A., Riadi, I., & Anshori, I. (2018). Analisis Bukti Digital Facebook Messenger Menggunakan Metode Nist. It Journal Research and Development, 3(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.25299/itjrd.2018.vol3(1).1658
Yudhana, A., Umar, R., & Ahmadi, A.-. (2018). Akuisisi Data Forensik Google Drive Pada Android Dengan Metode National Institute of Justice ( NIJ ). Jurnal CoreIT: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Ilmu Komputer Dan Teknologi Informasi, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.24014/coreit.v4i1.5803
Yusoff, Y., Ismail, R., & Hassan, Z. (2011). Common Phases of Computer Forensics Investigation Models. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 3(3), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsit.2011.3302
Zuhriyanto, I., Yudhana, A., & Riadi, I. (2018). Perancangan Digital Forensik pada Aplikasi Twitter Menggunakan Metode Live Forensics. In Seminar Nasional Informatika 2008 (semnasIF 2008) (Vol. 2018, pp. 86–91).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26798/jiko.v6i2.621
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 664 timesPDF (Bahasa Indonesia) - 348 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Rusydi Umar, Anton Yudhana, Muhammad Noor Fadillah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.